Welcome to this exploration of LLM reasoning abilities, where we’ll tackle a big question: can models like GPT, Llama, Mistral, and Gemma truly reason, or are they just clever pattern matchers? With each new release, we’re seeing these models hitting higher benchmark scores, often giving the impression they’re on the verge of genuine problem-solving abilities. But a new study from Apple, “GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models”, offers a reality check — and its findings could shift how we think about these capabilities.

If you are not a member, read here.

As an LLM Engineer for almost two years, I’m gonna share my perspective on this topic, including why it’s essential for LLMs to move beyond memorized patterns and deliver real reasoning. We’ll also break down the key findings from the GSM-Symbolic study, which reveals the gaps in mathematical reasoning these models still face. Finally, I’ll reflect on what this means for applying LLMs in real-world settings, where true reasoning — not just an impressive-looking response — is what we really need.

Why Does LLM Reasoning Matter?