In our reviews of Lunar Lake systems, we’ve noted that a particular bright spot for the new Intel SoC, besides its excellent efficiency, is its graphics performance. However, the previous-generation Meteor Lake machines could also offer great graphics performance—when using unlimited power budgets, at least. How does Lunar Lake fare against the competition from both inside and out when sharply power-limited, as it would be in a handheld? Let’s try to figure that out…
It turns out, pretty damn well. Chinese-language tech ‘tuber Geekerwan compared Lunar Lake against competing parts from AMD, Apple, Qualcomm, and Intel’s own previous generation in a variety of games at both 30W and 15W power limits. The 30W results are impressive in their own right, with Lunar Lake easily holding its own or dominating in every single benchmark against AMD’s Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU.
While the Ryzen Z1 Extreme used in the ROG Ally and Lenovo Legion Go is considerably more powerful than “Aerith” at higher power limits, it actually tends to struggle at lower limits like 15W. It was really designed for laptops rather than handhelds, and it struggles to keep up clocks on its eight CPU cores and twelve GPU cores with only 15W to spare around the components.
Lunar Lake, meanwhile, sprints out ahead, with excellent performance out of its Xe2-based graphics component. As we noted in the headline, this bodes very well for gaming handhelds based on Intel’s new baby SoC, which pretty much live and die at the 15W power limit. While devices like the ROG Ally X can pack in huge batteries to allow hours of gameplay at higher power limits, this does make them more expensive and unwieldy.