Writings, Papers and Blogs on Text Models

Software

NeRF Editing and Inpainting Techniques: Abstract and Introduction | HackerNoon

Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction 2. Related Work 2.1. NeRF Editing and 2.2. Inpainting Techniques 2.3. Text-Guided Visual Content Generation 3. Method 3.1. Training View Pre-processing 3.2. Progressive Training 3.3. 4D Extension 4. Experiments and 4.1. Experimental Setups 4.2. Ablation and comparison 5. Conclusion and 6. References ABSTRACT Current Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) can generate photorealistic novel views. For editing 3D scenes represented by NeRF, with the advent of generative models, this paper

Read More »
Software

NeRF Editing and Inpainting Techniques: Progressive Training | HackerNoon

Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction 2. Related Work 2.1. NeRF Editing and 2.2. Inpainting Techniques 2.3. Text-Guided Visual Content Generation 3. Method 3.1. Training View Pre-processing 3.2. Progressive Training 3.3. 4D Extension 4. Experiments and 4.1. Experimental Setups 4.2. Ablation and comparison 5. Conclusion and 6. References 3.2. Progressive Training Warmup Training. Our training image pre-processing stage provides a good initialization for rough convergence. Before fine-tuning on these images to get fine convergence,

Read More »

NeRF Editing and Inpainting Techniques: Training View Pre-processing | HackerNoon

Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction 2. Related Work 2.1. NeRF Editing and 2.2. Inpainting Techniques 2.3. Text-Guided Visual Content Generation 3. Method 3.1. Training View Pre-processing 3.2. Progressive Training 3.3. 4D Extension 4. Experiments and 4.1. Experimental Setups 4.2. Ablation and comparison 5. Conclusion and 6. References 3.1. Training View Pre-processing Text-guided visual content generation is inherently a highly underdetermined problem: for a given text prompt, there are infinitely many object appearances that

Read More »

NeRF Editing and Inpainting Techniques: Conclusion and References | HackerNoon

Table of Links Abstract and 1. Introduction 2. Related Work 2.1. NeRF Editing and 2.2. Inpainting Techniques 2.3. Text-Guided Visual Content Generation 3. Method 3.1. Training View Pre-processing 3.2. Progressive Training 3.3. 4D Extension 4. Experiments and 4.1. Experimental Setups 4.2. Ablation and comparison 5. Conclusion and 6. References 5. Conclusion We introduce Inpaint4DNeRF, a unified framework that can directly generate text-guided, background-appropriate, and multi-view consistent content within an existing NeRF. To ensure convergence from

Read More »

How a Herd of Models Challenges ChatGPT’s Dominance: Abstract and Introduction | HackerNoon

Authors: (1) Surya Narayanan Hari, Department of Biology and Biological Engineering California Institute of Technology (Email: [email protected]); (2) Matt Thomson, Department of Biology and Biological Engineering Program in Computational and Neural Systems California Institute of Technology (Email: [email protected]). Table of Links Abstract and Introduction Conclusion and discussion, and References Abstract Currently, over a thousand LLMs exist that are multi-purpose and are capable of performing real world tasks, including Q&A, text summarization, content generation, etc. However,

Read More »
Software

Our Annotations Guide for BIG-Bench Mistake | HackerNoon

Authors: (1) Gladys Tyen, University of Cambridge, Dept. of Computer Science & Technology, ALTA Institute, and Work done during an internship at Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (2) Hassan Mansoor, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (3) Victor Carbune, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (4) Peter Chen, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution ([email protected]); (5) Tony Mak, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution (e-mail: [email protected]). Table of Links Abstract and Introduction BIG-Bench Mistake Benchmark results Backtracking Related Works Conclusion,

Read More »
Software

BIG-Bench Mistake: Implementational Details That Are Important | HackerNoon

Authors: (1) Gladys Tyen, University of Cambridge, Dept. of Computer Science & Technology, ALTA Institute, and Work done during an internship at Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (2) Hassan Mansoor, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (3) Victor Carbune, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (4) Peter Chen, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution ([email protected]); (5) Tony Mak, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution (e-mail: [email protected]). Table of Links Abstract and Introduction BIG-Bench Mistake Benchmark results Backtracking Related Works Conclusion,

Read More »
Software

LLMs Can Correct Reasoning Errors! But Not Without Limitations | HackerNoon

Authors: (1) Gladys Tyen, University of Cambridge, Dept. of Computer Science & Technology, ALTA Institute, and Work done during an internship at Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (2) Hassan Mansoor, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (3) Victor Carbune, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (4) Peter Chen, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution ([email protected]); (5) Tony Mak, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution (e-mail: [email protected]). Table of Links Abstract and Introduction BIG-Bench Mistake Benchmark results Backtracking Related Works Conclusion,

Read More »
Software

Using LLMs to Correct Reasoning Mistakes: Related Works That You Should Know About | HackerNoon

Authors: (1) Gladys Tyen, University of Cambridge, Dept. of Computer Science & Technology, ALTA Institute, and Work done during an internship at Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (2) Hassan Mansoor, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (3) Victor Carbune, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (4) Peter Chen, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution ([email protected]); (5) Tony Mak, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution (e-mail: [email protected]). Table of Links Abstract and Introduction BIG-Bench Mistake Benchmark results Backtracking Related Works Conclusion,

Read More »
Software

LLMs Cannot Find Reasoning Errors, but They Can Correct Them! | HackerNoon

Authors: (1) Gladys Tyen, University of Cambridge, Dept. of Computer Science & Technology, ALTA Institute, and Work done during an internship at Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (2) Hassan Mansoor, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (3) Victor Carbune, Google Research (e-mail: [email protected]); (4) Peter Chen, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution ([email protected]); (5) Tony Mak, Google Research and Equal leadership contribution (e-mail: [email protected]). Table of Links Abstract and Introduction BIG-Bench Mistake Benchmark results Backtracking Related Works Conclusion,

Read More »