Even though Slack proudly touts its Slack AI feature as helpful time-savers, users are questioning how the software gets its job done. One user pointed out just how invasive Slack AI can be, using Slack’s own words.
Slack, bought by Salesforce in 2021, advertises itself as an AI-powered platform for work which brings all the user’s conversations, apps, and customers together in one place. However, it turns out those AI-powered features, also needs access to a myriad of user data, as Corey Quinn pointed out on X/Twitter recently.
Quinn shares a screenshot of part of Slack’s data management policy, as another user remarked was specifically part of the “Privacy, principles, search, learning and artificial intelligence.”
After Quinn posted his tweet, others began chiming in. X user @kepano remarked, “it is an inevitability if you don’t have sovereignty over your data.” While Steven Tey remarked, “This is wild, thanks for sharing! Still baffled that they would require you to send an email to opt-out of selling your data.”
Slack was not silent throughout the X thread, remarking in part, “Hello from Slack! To clarify, Slack has platform-level machine-learning models for things like channel and emoji recommendations and search results. And yes, customers can exclude their data from helping train those (non-generative) ML models. Customer data belongs to the customer.” The reply also adds that Slack “does not build or train models in such a way that could learn, memorize, or be able to reproduce some part of customer data.”
It seems the ire is mainly on Slack opting users in automatically, and then requiring them to email Slack HQ to opt-out. X user @xkarasy highlighted this when she posted, “Instead of asking customers to email to opt-out, the default should have been opt-out. Then, ask the customer to email to opt-in.”
As others have pointed out in recent days, Slack’s policies are misleading at best, stating that user’s data is safe from AI training. Anyone who would like to read more on Slack AI can do so here.